Genesis revisited Last Post 12 Aug 2004 06:12 PM by SteveW. 2 Replies. | Sort: |
|  Prev | You are not authorized to post a reply. | |
SteveW
Advanced Member
Posts:662
 | | 12 Aug 2004 06:12 PM | | Check out some of Sitchin's ideas on Nibiru, Tiamat and Marduk - he is definitely peerless....
Steve White | | | |
| | C.S.I.
New Member
Posts:42
| | 06 Nov 2006 12:10 AM | | Hello Steve.
I think this topic may benefit from recent science news.
Depending on the forums general familiarity with 'Zak'
Sheesh! A year and a half ago and no reply.
Echo...echo...echoOOOo,heh!
Would anyone care to further discuss this subject,I could
probably have a peek around the Net and supply some up to
date research that may have bearings on Sitchen's Theories.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Sensational Human Genome Discovery
THE CASE OF ADAM’S ALIEN GENES.
quote:
"...Enki suggested that they use their genetic knowledge to create the needed Primitive Workers. When the other leaders of the Anunnaki asked: How can you create a new being? He answered:
"The being that we need already exists;
all that we have to do is put our mark on it.
What he had in mind was to upgrade genetically the existing hominids, who were already on Earth through Evolution, by adding some of the genes of the more advanced Anunnaki. That the Anunnaki, who could already travel in space 450,000 years ago, possessed the genomic science (whose threshold we have now reached) is clear not only from the actual texts but also from numerous depictions in which the double-helix of the DNA is rendered as Entwined Serpents (a symbol still used for medicine and healing) -- see illustration ‘A’ below.
http://www.sitchin.com/images/dna1.jpg
http://www.sitchin.com/adam.htm
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC
.......................................................
Human, Chimp Ancestors May Have Mated, DNA Suggests
Brian Handwerk
for National Geographic News
.......................................................
May 17, 2006
quote:
Early human ancestors and chimpanzee ancestors may have mated and produced offspring, according to a new DNA study.
The study suggests that the human and chimp lineages initially split off from a single ape species about ten million years ago.
Later, early chimps and early human ancestors may have begun interbreeding,
creating hybrids and complicating and prolonging the evolutionary separation of the two lineages.
This link should enable the reader to Compare to Sitchen.
quote:
The second and final split occurred some four million years after the first one, the report proposes.
"One thing that emerges is a reestimate of the date when humans and chimps last exchanged genes," said David Reich, a professor at Harvard Medical School's Department of Genetics in Boston.
"Our data strongly suggest that occurred more recently than 6.3 million years ago and probably more recently than 5.4 million years ago," said Reich, senior author of the study, to be published tomorrow in the journal Nature.
"This paper is very interesting, because it provides a hypothesis that is outside of the currently accepted dogma," said Kateryna Makova, a professor at Pennsylvania State University's Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics who is unaffiliated with the study.
..................................................................
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/05/humans-chimps.html
Hope this helps ,a year or so belated.
I never claimed that I could walk on water... | | | |
| C.S.I.
New Member
Posts:42
| | 25 Apr 2008 09:01 PM | | ........................................
Earliest hominid: Not a hominid at all?
........................................
quote:
Nor does the skull resemble a living chimpanzee
no fossil records of chimpanzees exist
so it's impossible to compare to earlier descendents, Wolpff said.
Relevant to Sitchen's intonation.
What either agrees/disagrees with his hypothesis?
http://physorg.com/news69951315.html
quote:
"The big message it sends us is our ancestors never looked like a chimpanzee," Wolpoff said. "This thing is clearly saying that chimpanzees are just as different from this ancestor as we are. They are just different in a different way."
Wolpoff said the skull could be a common ancestor of humans and living chimps.
"Now we have insight into what an early ape looked like, but we have no fossils of apes after it, so you can't tell clearly," he said.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
quote:
"no fossil records of chimpanzees exist"
I'll leave that little factoid/morsel to ponder.
Hope that helps Steve.
Clay.
I never claimed that I could walk on water... | | | |
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|