Catal Huyuk Last Post 25 Apr 2008 09:00 PM by Morning Herald. 1 Replies. | Sort: |
| PrevNext | You are not authorized to post a reply. | |
Morning Herald
 New Member
 Posts:2

 | | 25 Apr 2008 09:00 PM | | As most of you probably know, Catal Huyuk is the site of a long-abandoned town of southern Turkey, now but a mound . First excavated by James Mellaart from 1961 to 1963, he discovered 12 occupation levels and used the method of radio carbon dating to determine the first settlement to be c 6500 BC and the last c. 5700 BC, thus considering the whole time of settlement to be 800 years. Both the dates and the time of occupation are what I am taking issue with.
But just to remind you all: The houses were built of sun-dried brick with wooden framing. They were unique in that they were all connected to one another so that there were no streets in between them; they were all touching each other to form a single compound. Access was by way ofladders to the roof where the entrances were.
For the purpose of chronology, the walls of these houses were covered with white plaster and so the number of layers speak of time, albeit, with an assumed frequency of plastering. Also the dead were buried beneath the houses and the number of burials hints at the number of generations between rebuilding the houses.
Mellaart claimed that the physical evidence agreed well with the C-14 dating of the settlement. The non-c-14 physical evidence is that which gives an indication of the life-span of a house, as rationalized by the plasterings and the number of dead buried beneath them, as above, and multiplied by the number of levels.
Though I believe most archaeologists are generally agreed that buildings made of sun-dried brick have short lives – a generation, more or less, depending on climate – Mellaart believes the buildings at Catal Huyuk lasted 120 years because of the way they were built --side by side.
To protect them from rain and snow, the inhabitants replastered them periodically and the number of layers of plaster per house agrees with Mellaart’s dates if the climate today is the same as it was back then, however this is an assumption. If we take a generation to be 30 years, then by his reckoning 4 generations lived in each house before it was torn down and rebuilt. Even most houses of modern times have not lasted that long.
Then there is the question of how many dead were buried beneath each house. This should provide a clue as to how many people lived in them. There is an average of three skeletons per house. Mellaart admits this not enough to justify 120 years per house. Hence, in this case, the physical evidence actually shows a short duration for the settlement. Three people probably represents a generation and so the houses were actually rebuilt back then as often as sun-dried brick houses are today, if not more often. A generation per house gives us a total of 360 years as the time span for the whole settlement.
To corroborate this, if we take the Biblical date of the Dispersion -- c. 2150 BC -- as the probable date for the settlement of Catal Huyuk and proportionally reduce the carbon dates, we get a span of 265 years. Thus the settlement may be dated tentatively from 2150 to 1885 BC.
I know my need for Christ | | | |
| | alicitci
 New Member
 Posts:2

 | | 25 Apr 2008 09:02 PM | | | First of all, I am not a archaelogist. I am interested in history on hobby level.
Although the recent assesment regarding the age of Çatalhöyük is not as older as before further to studies of Ian Hodder team, it is still 7000 years old. Çatalhöyük is close to Konya, not southern part of Turkey. It is on the Anatolian Plateau, which means the territory is not mountainous, but mainly flat and the ground is silty. Thus,the clay is most abundant natural material. Limestone mounts are existing and not so far from the excavation location. The settlement duration and the timing of Çatalhöyük is sure an interesting subject. However, the level of civilization unearthed in this site is incredible with the tools invented, figurines worked out, the primitive beliefs, and similar findings. The acomodations of the Çatalhöyük inhabitants are made of simple clay using wood and bushes as structural and reinforcing materials. Clay is not so strong compared with the lime that provides strength to the mixture. Point to point,we know that lime had been used in the base of the units. It is not a general application. This fact may mean that they had found the lime naturally, where they had not known how to produce it from limestone. When the natural source of lime had been used totally, they had left using it in their accomodations. As a result they used weaker structures. However, the clay is proven to be more durable to time (not strong but durable)than limestone. Using the settlement layers, and life of each, Mr. Mellaart's estimations regarding the timing and settlement duration, as well as Mr.Hodder's, are supported with advance techniques such as C14.
The second argumentation, intramural burials, is an evidence when there is lack of more reliable supporting findings. As you may know, among the archaelogists, the reason for intramural burials is still being discussed without an amicable answer. Then, when and which way, did they bury their deceased family members? Did they move the older burials when they discovered them during excavations. Why did they bury the children and babies closer to the ovens? Many unknowns are existing. I personally believe the main reason for intramural burials was love against the deceased person. I also believe that they had respected all previous dead people. Nobody knows what the beliefs of these comunities about life were. They might be believing in endless life where they would continue to live in undergound world after the death. The Mother Goddess figurines found prove that they believed in Mother Nature. Earth was the mother of creating power. It created every year their crops, made the trees alive again, water was under control of this power. They believed in undergound life after the death. Thus they burried their dead relatives. They might be believeing the deceaased would be together with them if they were burried in-house. If you consider the size of the units, replacing of previous remainings might be thought logical. In addition the older ones were more distant to them, thus sensual links were weaker.
Under the light of all these unknowns, I prefer to be at side of advanced metheods supported time estimations. Today's religious beliefs can not hold light to these unknowns.
Ali Citci
http://kalkantique.blogspot.com | | | |
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
Active Forums 4.1 |